da idea of exclusive content in general angerz me actually.

This is hardly new. Brotherhood had PS3-exclusive content as well, which X360 owners had to pay extra for. Might be a disc space issue.

Hey, here is a clue maybe Ubisoft is giving PS3 exclusive content because the franchise was originally suppose to be a PS3 exclusive and 360 has already to much exclusive & timed content this gen.

Had the option of taking American History- but I thought it would be uninteresting so I passed on it. Mistake since it was an easy mark. -_-

I know this is going to be false in many ways, but should be interesting.

Had the option of taking American History- but I thought it would be uninteresting so I passed on it. Mistake since it was an easy mark. -_-

I know this is going to be false in many ways, but should be interesting.

agree.

im very excited for the american revolution setting.

just took my midterms on world history, and wow lots of interesting stuff happened in the civil war.

then this………wot da ‘ell Ubisoft?

granted i gotz me a PS3, but not everyone can afford multiple consoles.

yes that is undeniably true that Assassin’s Creed was going to be a PS3 Exclusive. 

But us PS3 owners have the advantage of Exclusive bonus content only for PS3 owners. 
I also own a 360, but I will definitely continually prefer PS3 cause of its diverse library of games. 

Microsoft Xbox fans crack me up they are getting a bunch of exclusive content and every year they want to cry when Ubisoft give Sony exclusive content on Assassins Creed but yet they seem to have forgot that Assassins Creed was originally supposed to be exclusive to PS3.

 while I don’t care for exclusive dlc they have no reason to be upset with all the exclusive dlc they get or timed dlc.

Glad to see the PS3 showing some multiplat DLC exclusivity love to its fans.

Whats good for the goose……..