<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: BioWare on Activision&#8217;s PS3 Threat: &#8220;Silly&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.gematsu.com/2009/07/bioware-on-activisions-ps3-threat-silly/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.gematsu.com/2009/07/bioware-on-activisions-ps3-threat-silly</link>
	<description>Japanese Video Game News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 21:26:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: incredibilistic		</title>
		<link>https://www.gematsu.com/2009/07/bioware-on-activisions-ps3-threat-silly#comment-15231</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[incredibilistic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 21:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gematsu.com/?p=15793#comment-15231</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m glad someone spoke out about this. Should Sony drop the price? Yes, but they shouldn&#039;t be strong-armed into doing and certainly shouldn&#039;t be threatened to do it just because Activision says so.

And when you post the numbers like that, 22 million to 30 million, the race is a lot closer than many people will recognize considering the fact that Microsoft launched an entire year before Sony. That&#039;s not to say Sony hasn&#039;t done their fair share of shooting themselves in the foot but dropping the Playstation name, as BioWare pointed out, is a not only premature but childish. 

Activision hasn&#039;t sold hardware for decades and all of a sudden they want to dictate to Sony what they should be doing with their hardware.

Still, I hope Sony&#039;s does drop the price and does so this year. They&#039;d be smart to drop it right around October. While Best Buy is giving away some awesome bundles I&#039;d like to see a $299 PS3. I&#039;d REALLY like to see a $249 PS3 but you can put that in the silly column along with Activision&#039;s comments.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad someone spoke out about this. Should Sony drop the price? Yes, but they shouldn&#8217;t be strong-armed into doing and certainly shouldn&#8217;t be threatened to do it just because Activision says so.</p>
<p>And when you post the numbers like that, 22 million to 30 million, the race is a lot closer than many people will recognize considering the fact that Microsoft launched an entire year before Sony. That&#8217;s not to say Sony hasn&#8217;t done their fair share of shooting themselves in the foot but dropping the Playstation name, as BioWare pointed out, is a not only premature but childish. </p>
<p>Activision hasn&#8217;t sold hardware for decades and all of a sudden they want to dictate to Sony what they should be doing with their hardware.</p>
<p>Still, I hope Sony&#8217;s does drop the price and does so this year. They&#8217;d be smart to drop it right around October. While Best Buy is giving away some awesome bundles I&#8217;d like to see a $299 PS3. I&#8217;d REALLY like to see a $249 PS3 but you can put that in the silly column along with Activision&#8217;s comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Object Caching 60/79 objects using Memcache
Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: www.gematsu.com @ 2026-07-12 00:55:43 by W3 Total Cache
-->